RACHEL MARTIN, HOST:
Former President Donald Trump conned his supporters out of $250 million. That is what the Area committee investigating the January 6 Capitol rebel says.
A MARTINEZ, HOST:
The committee display that the previous president did not simply lie about profitable the 2020 election; he then advised his marketing campaign donors that he wanted cash to protect the lie in court docket. This is California Democrat and committee member Zoe Lofgren.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
ZOE LOFGREN: No longer best was once there the large lie; there was once the large scam.
MARTINEZ: This as most sensible advisers to the previous president advised the panel that they attempted to influence Trump clear of his plan to overturn the Democratic election.
MARTIN: NPR congressional correspondent Claudia Grisales joins us now. Hi there, Claudia.
CLAUDIA GRISALES, BYLINE: Excellent morning, Rachel.
MARTIN: So we simply discussed that determine. Donald Trump is claimed to have raised 1 / 4 of a thousand million greenbacks from his supporters off his election lies. What’s the proof?
GRISALES: We learn about all this from marketing campaign finance filings. And it was once within the open. Trump was once sending dozens of fundraising emails to supporters, like small donors, as he pressed those election lies. On the time, NPR reported that virtually none of that cash was once going to criminal fights tied to the election. And all the way through the listening to, Congresswoman Lofgren argued Trump shifted to a stop-the-steal operation after his loss to stay the cash flowing, and this was once a part of a bigger grifting operation.
MARTIN: OK, provide an explanation for what that implies. What was once the bigger grifting operation?
GRISALES: Proper. The panel stated cash was once going to a Trump tremendous PAC – and that’s now his major political operation – and to pay down marketing campaign debt and a few bills that integrated charges to the Trump Resort. Lofgren additionally stated after the listening to that Kimberly Guilfoyle, Donald Trump Jr.’s fiancee, made $60,000 for look charges for talking on the rally prior to the assault.
MARTIN: We will have to say that was once a speech that was once best 2 1/2 mins lengthy, proper?
GRISALES: Precisely, sure. Chairman Bennie Thompson advised me information about this got here from public and inside tax earnings data. And whilst main points to this point are restricted, extra is anticipated to be shared in long term hearings and their ultimate record.
MARTIN: OK. Such a lot of extra questions in there, however let’s pivot for a 2d as a result of the day before today we additionally realized much more about how Trump aides had been seeking to persuade him to prevent mendacity concerning the election. What emerged?
GRISALES: Proper. At the evening of the election, marketing campaign supervisor Invoice Stepien stated he advised the president to not declare victory.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
BILL STEPIEN: Ballots had been nonetheless being counted. Ballots had been nonetheless going to be counted for days. And it was once some distance too early to be making any proclamation like that.
GRISALES: We additionally realized from different testimony that former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani stated Trump will have to declare victory however, it sounds as if, was once intoxicated, a declare Giuliani disputes. In spite of everything, Trump did falsely declare that victory. Former Lawyer Normal Invoice Barr stated he met with Trump on 3 separate events to put out how the Justice Division discovered no proof of fashionable election fraud. And of their ultimate assembly, Barr stated Trump made baseless claims that ballots had been being manipulated.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
BILL BARR: I used to be moderately demoralized as a result of I believed, boy, if he in point of fact believes these things, he has misplaced touch with – he is develop into indifferent from fact.
MARTIN: OK, however did Invoice Barr provide an explanation for why, if he believed this, he stored supporting the president publicly?
GRISALES: Proper. This was once the case for plenty of Trump officers on the time. However Barr did say he spoke to a reporter in the course of all this after which surrender because it become transparent not anything was once converting.
MARTIN: So the Area committee is alleging that Donald Trump used the large deceive take cash from his supporters, small donation-givers. Is that this a criminal offense, Claudia?
GRISALES: Proper. That continues to be observed. Thompson advised newshounds final evening he does not see the panel issuing a legal referral for Trump. However Republican Vice Chair Liz Cheney temporarily tweeted the ones discussions are nonetheless ongoing. In essence, the panel has laid out the sort of advice in court docket filings and those hearings, despite the fact that they do not do it officially. That stated, Lawyer Normal Merrick Garland advised newshounds the day before today he is staring at those hearings, and in the long run, that call to pursue a legal case towards Trump is within the Justice Division’s palms.
MARTIN: NPR’s Claudia Grisales. Thanks.
GRISALES: Thanks a lot.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
MARTIN: Months of fearful ready may after all be over for fogeys who wish to vaccinate their younger children towards COVID-19.
MARTINEZ: Yeah, as of late the Meals and Drug Management kicks off a two-day assembly that may culminate with a advice about whether or not to authorize the primary vaccines for children more youthful than 5.
MARTIN: We now have were given NPR well being correspondent Rob Stein with us. Excellent morning, Rob.
ROB STEIN, BYLINE: Morning, Rachel.
MARTIN: Rob, I think like we now have had this dialog time and again (laughter).
STEIN: I do know.
MARTIN: And there is at all times some other impediment, some other impediment. So right here we’re. A large number of adults I do know have had 4 vaccine pictures. The youngest children have had 0. Why has this taken goodbye?
STEIN: Yeah, Rachel, it is been a maddening wait for plenty of folks of young children, little toddlers and different younger children. They are the final staff to get an opportunity to get vaccinated, and that’s the reason since the research for those littlest children began later than adults and older children, and it grew to become out to be so much trickier than anticipated to search out simply the correct dose for those littlest ones. Nevertheless it seems like Moderna and Pfizer and BioNTech after all did it. The FDA has launched the company’s checks of each vaccines and conclude that each seem like they safely stimulate sufficient immunity to give protection to children as younger as 6 months previous.
MARTIN: Which is excellent. Let us know extra about those two vaccines. There are some essential variations to grasp, proper?
STEIN: Yeah. Yeah, the Moderna vaccine is 2 pictures that children get a month aside. Every shot for the youngest children accommodates about one-quarter of the dose that adults get. The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine accommodates simply one-tenth the dose adults get. So the youngest children want 3 pictures of that vaccine. The primary two are spaced 3 weeks aside; the 3rd comes two months later. So, you already know, if those vaccines get approved, you’ll see it would get roughly tough for fogeys deciding which to get. Each vaccines glance excellent at stimulating the immune device sufficient to give protection to children from critical illness, however the Moderna vaccine was once best about 38 to 50% efficient at protective children towards getting unwell in any respect. The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was once about 80%. However the ones estimates are according to very small numbers. So it is unclear how the vaccines will in point of fact stack up towards every different, particularly towards the more recent omicron subvariants.
I talked to a few folks who say they would like Moderna simply because two pictures way it may not take as lengthy to vaccinate their children. Others might desire the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine since the decrease dose might purpose fewer fevers, regardless that that is not in point of fact transparent but both.
MARTIN: So folks need to weigh all that.
MARTIN: This two-day assembly opens as of late. Stroll us via the following steps right here.
STEIN: Yeah, yeah. As of late, the FDA advisers will overview Moderna’s vaccines for children ages 6 via 17. Now, this is not as essential since those children can already get the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, however that units the degree for the primary match day after today, when the advisers will believe the 2 vaccines for children more youthful than age 5. It seems like an affordable wager the advisers will suggest authorization. I mentioned this with Dr. Ofer Levy, a Harvard pediatrician at the committee taking into consideration those vaccines.
OFER LEVY: Those vaccines seem to be protected and seem to urge an antibody reaction that is believed to give a contribution to coverage and are related to a discounted possibility of COVID. So the ones are 3 sure options of the information that I am reviewing at this level.
STEIN: If the committee recommends authorization, the FDA and CDC will most likely give the fairway gentle by means of the tip of the week.
MARTIN: After which when can children get the pictures?
STEIN: You realize, the Biden management is already delivery hundreds of thousands of doses of the vaccine out. So pediatricians, hospitals and different puts can get started vaccinating those children as early as subsequent Tuesday if the authorization is going via and the whole thing is going easily.
MARTIN: All proper. We can wait, and we can see. NPR well being correspondent Rob Stein. Thank you for the replace, Rob.
STEIN: Yeah. Certain factor, Rachel.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
MARTIN: OK, as of late 4 extra states dangle their number one elections.
MARTINEZ: In South Carolina, two Republican participants of Congress face number one challengers after crossing former President Trump. And in Nevada, there are a selection of aggressive GOP primaries, as Republicans goal to unseat Democrats within the state.
MARTIN: Becoming a member of us now to speak extra about the ones races in Nevada is Bert Johnson of KUNR Radio in Reno. Hi there, Bert.
BERT JOHNSON, BYLINE: Excellent morning.
MARTIN: Let’s get started with the race for the Senate. It is a seat Republicans very a lot need. Who is within the working?
JOHNSON: So the frontrunner to this point is Adam Laxalt. Fresh polls have him up by means of double digits over his challengers. And Laxalt’s a former state lawyer normal who misplaced the 2018 race for governor. He additionally comes from a political circle of relatives. His grandfather was once Nevada governor and a U.S. senator. Laxalt’s been counseled by means of Trump, and he was once the co-chair of Trump’s 2020 marketing campaign in Nevada. He parroted the previous president’s election lies in that function, and he led a host of unsuccessful complaints to overturn the election. However he is dealing with a problem from retired Military Captain Sam Brown, who is been elevating greater than Laxalt on the subject of small-dollar donations. The Republican nominee goes to stand off towards Senator Catherine Cortez Masto, and forecasters see it as a toss-up race in what is more likely to be a tricky atmosphere for Democrats.
MARTIN: Yeah. So say extra about that – difficult for Democrats. Is that still the case for state workplaces?
JOHNSON: You realize, it’s. There is a equivalent dynamic for the governor’s race, for instance. Republicans are lining as much as tackle a Democratic incumbent. Main the pack at the GOP aspect is Joe Lombardo, the sheriff of Clark County. He won nationwide consideration for his reaction to the mass capturing at the Las Vegas Strip. And now he has the endorsement of former President Trump. And he is forward within the polls. The secretary of state’s race is some other one to observe. Republican incumbent Barbara Cegavske is term-limited, so she can not run once more. And in 2020, she in truth stood as much as the Trump marketing campaign’s baseless election fraud claims, so the state GOP censured her. Now various applicants are vying to interchange Cegavske, together with Democrat Cisco Aguilar and, at the Republican aspect, Jim Marchant, who is repeated Trump’s election lies. And he in truth spoke at a QAnon conference in Las Vegas final yr, too.
MARTIN: I imply, Bert, this is a couple of applicants who you’ve got simply discussed there, Republicans who have all made those baseless claims concerning the 2020 election. Do you pay attention that false narrative so much in Nevada?
JOHNSON: You do. In reality, I simply printed a record with my colleague Tabitha Mueller from considered one of our spouse newsrooms, The Nevada Unbiased. There have been – we had been taking a look into state legislative races if so, and there is a candidate working in a couple of 3rd of the ones districts who helps the, quote, “giant lie.” A few of them explicitly say it; others, particularly the Republican incumbents, may not pop out and say it at once, however they solid doubts at the effects.
MARTIN: OK, Bert Johnson of KUNR in Reno. It is number one day in Nevada. He is been given us a preview. Thanks such a lot, Bert.
Copyright © 2022 NPR. All rights reserved. Seek advice from our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional knowledge.
NPR transcripts are created on a hurry cut-off date by means of an NPR contractor. This newsletter might not be in its ultimate shape and could also be up to date or revised sooner or later. Accuracy and availability might range. The authoritative report of NPR’s programming is the audio report.